The Interactive Robotics Group aims to imagine the future of work by designing collaborative robot teammates that enhance human capability. It considers the use of social robots in daily life, grounding the work in field studies conducted at a school, train station, shopping mall, and science museum. People, including doctors, nurses, and military personnel, often learn their roles in complex organizations through a training and apprenticeship process. The group researches how robots are perceived as social interaction partners in different contexts such as industrial production, medicine, public spaces, and in the household. The idea is to design arobotic system capable of performing remote physicalexamination with palpation (i.e., pressing a patient's stomach toidentify pain regions and stiffness of organs) andultrasonography.
How to be Helpful? Human-Robot Interaction in Social Robotics. If you would like to contact us about our work, please scroll down to the people section and click on After the interaction, we asked the participants to ratethe robot's anthropomorphism, likability, and perceived intelligence.
Tag Archives: MIT Interactive Robotics Group The Robot Army Marches On. We also interviewedthe participants on their opinion about the interaction. The combination of engineering, empirical, and field studies provides readers with rich information to guide in developing practical interactive robots.Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H. (2013). Our evaluation shows that recognition accuracy is only as high as 70.2% for certain topics and at 30.0% on average, even for manually created topic corpora. In contrast to existing research, we assess dimensionsof user experience that have not been considered so far and we analyze the reactionsusers express when a robot makes a mistake. The Interactive Robotics Group aims to imagine the future of work by designing collaborative robot teammates that enhance human capability. Website. Models and algorithms to predict in real time the next actions of a human working together with a robot Stollnberger, Gerald; Weiss, Astrid; Tscheligi, Manfred Stollnberger, Gerald; Weiss, Astrid; Tscheligi, Manfred Gonsior, Barbara; Landsiedel, Christian; Mirnig, Nicole; Sosnowski, Stefan; Strasser, Ewald; Buss, Martin; Kühnlenz, Kolja; Tscheligi, Manfred; Weiss, Astrid; Wollherr, Dirk; Złotowski, JakubImpacts of Multimodal Feedback on Efficiency of Proactive Information Retrieval from Task-Related HRI Moubayed, Samer Al; Beskow, Jonas; Blomberg, Mats; Granström, Björn; Gustafson, Joakim; Mirnig, Nicole; Skantze, GabrielTalking with Furhat--multi-party interaction with a back-projected robot head Moubayed, Samer Al; Beskow, Jonas; Granström, Björn; Gustafson, Joakim; Mirnig, Nicole; Skantze, Gabriel; Tscheligi, ManfredFurhat goes to Robotville: A large-scale multiparty human-robot interaction data collection in a public space Buchner, Roland; Mirnig, Nicole; Weiss, Astrid; Tscheligi, ManfredEvaluating in Real Life Robotic Environment -- Bringing together Research and Practice Mirnig, Nicole; Gonsior, Barbara; Sosnowski, Stefan; Landsiedel, Christian; Wollherr, Dirk; Weiss, Astrid; Tscheligi, ManfredFeedback Guidelines for Multimodal Human-Robot Interaction: How Should a Robot Give Feedback When Asking for Directions? But because robots lack the intelligence to accommodate their more dynamic human partners, robots and humans work independently. A. Shah, "Toward Safe Close-Proximity Human-Robot Interaction with Standard Industrial Robots", IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE), 08/2014. About; Research; Publications; News/Events; Robots . In the article we report on a study on social robots where we found that people liked a robot that makes errors considerably more than a robot that operated free from error. Technical failures are caused by technical shortcomings of the robot.