No individual solitary carnivore has ever been this large or this deadly. Even the 18-20 metres figure being tentatively (though some might say, optimistically) suggested by the scientific adviser, and based on some promising, yet fragmentary fossil evidence found at the time, was rather huge. How did the remains of Liopleurodon wash up in France, of all places? Hindsight is easy, after all. Two adult Eustreptospondylus(in a twist of irony) who survived the storm feed upon it.

6,390 millimetres. - Foffa, D.; Young, M.T.

In the animal kingdom, we may observe many rarer individuals among various species, that are considered "giants" compared to the average sizes of animals you will see with most of a given species. To judge by its weight (up to 10 tons for a full-grown adult), Liopleurodon was clearly the apex predator of its marine ecosystem, relentlessly gobbling fish, squids, and other, smaller marine reptiles.

It is less complete remains discovered in the Oxford clay that indicate lengths greater than this, though here we move into an area of rough estimates and guesswork.

General estimates for typical Clearly, this is notably smaller than the somewhat excessive 25 metres figure used for According to anecdotes from the primary scientific adviser for the episode, as listed in the credits, he had advised a figure of around 18-20 metres, though the producers and the director of Walking With Dinosaurs in 1999, wanted to essentially "tack on" another 5 metres as a margin of speculation so to speak.

The largest species, also far better understood than the rarer L.pachydeirus, is Liopleurodon ferox.

Scientifically Accurate Size (as of 2020): and notes on Scientific Speculation Chased by Sea Monsters: A Walking with Dinosaurs TrilogyTake your favorite fandoms with you and never miss a beat. - PLoS ONE 8 (5): 1–34 - Roger B. J. Benson, Mark Evans, Adam S. Smith, Judyth Sassoon, Scott Moore-Faye, Hilary F. Ketchum, Richard Forrest - 2013.

A vertebra at Peterborough Museum would seem to indicate a pliosaur of between 17 and 20 metres, and various fragments of snout and lower jaw in other museum collections suggest specimens of similar size."

Later on however, he was beached by a fearsome Jurassic tropical storm, and became a living banquet for Instead of eat him alive - because the Dinosaurs themselves could be killed - the scavengers waited for the old The largest species, also far better understood than the rarer 6.39 metres: or 639 centimetres: or approx. The fact that humanity has so much to learn about the present day oceans, leaves far, far more to be desired regarding our knowledge of the Mesozoic seas.

Fossil specimens that are broadly contemporary (Callovian to Kimmeridgian Stages of the Jurassic Period) with those from England and France referable to - Notes sur les reptiles fossiles. As discussed in slide #3, it can be very difficult to extrapolate the length and weight of marine reptiles from limited fossil remains. They lived as solitary carnivores, most likely behaving in the same way as some apex predator sharks do in their habitats - swimming at depth, and looking for silhouettes at the surface to then attack with extreme velocity and fatal impact force.
We only have one largely complete, and beautiful specimen of Did Pliosaurs keep growing throughout their lifespans like some reptiles do today?

In the program, a gigantic Liopleurodon was depicted attacking and devouring the theropod dinosaur Eustreptospondylus and some Ophthalmosauruses, before becoming beached during a typhoon and suffocating under its own weight. It would be wrong to be too strident in our claims about species so old as this, and we don't even have enough largely complete specimens to be sure of an even partially complete ontogenetic/life cycle process, evidenced with many fossils from juvenile to elderly adult. ThoughtCo uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. It is correct form to hold more outlandish and less excusable claims of a science programme to a higher standard of expectation and scrutiny, though it does stray into repetitive and outright unfair necromancy of criticisms that keep getting brought up over and over again about something that was released in 1999. This is highly logical, as mutations and variations in populations of the vast majority of animals will have a certain range.